Representing the New World: Locke and Slavery
Locke makes two opposing statements regarding the idea of slavery, it’s
position and effectiveness in society. His first idea holds the position that
slaves as property are immoral and unreasonable ethics to possess. He attacks
slavery and deems it a direct violation to the right of natural freedom in his essay
John
Locke Two Treatises of Government. However, he counters this argument in
his Second Treatise, John
Locke Two Treatises of Government, by approving the ideas of slavery specifically
in positions such as result of war, therefore POW’s or prisoner of war are sought
acceptable and moral reasons to posses’ slaves. It is important however to note
that within this second treatise Locke does not initially refer to these pow’s
as slaves rather servants or captives. Does then, the substitute for the noun
slave, determine the ethical morality of the matter and shift the argument entirely?
Slavery is immoral. Reclaiming
the identity and renaming it to sound more appealing and construct it to which
it falsely appears as a matter of choice does not brand the idea any more moral
or pleasing. When a prisoner of war becomes captive they are still enslaved to
the will of their capturer. They are not present of their own will. And unless
a servant is present performing duties of their own will without being forced
or persuaded to do so, they are essentially a slave as well.
Comments
Post a Comment